The text discusses the importance of understanding human anatomy in art, emphasizing that this knowledge can aid in appreciating inner thoughts expressed through art. It also addresses the criticism that some believe too much knowledge can lead to excessive or inappropriate display of anatomical understanding. The author suggests using "Human Studies" instead of "Anatomy" to describe this essential knowledge.
Usefulness of Human Studies
Just as in all the rest observed: yes, you must realize everything that can somewhat strengthen the judgment of the beholder, to clearly recognize the inner thought of images (whether they are mixed with outward actions of the body or only internally active in the mind).
It is also known to us that the extensive knowledge of Artistic Anatomy is somewhat poorly regarded by some with little understanding; and many believe that having too much knowledge of it makes it difficult for them to refrain from practicing it too extravagantly or to express it too lightly, whether appropriate or not, to show that they understand it; and others, who perhaps do not have such knowledge, or are embarrassed to showcase it, want to display it to surpass others. Thus, they assume that if such masters were not too boastful of their knowledge, they would not show it so commonly and everywhere.
This is why this necessary knowledge, not only is opposed by some, but is also perhaps practiced too modestly by others. Moreover, some have opposed Anatomy in Art, seeing that many have indeed misunderstood or misapplied it due to negligence or other reasons; and have come to create figures with very hard muscles, as if making anatomical mannequins.
We also, to not frighten these timid spirits, avoid the hateful and unsightly word Anatomy often, preferring to call this useful science by the softer name of Human Studies, though the first naming is